Open Access · Peer Reviewed
PDF
DOI

Keywords

Onlayn baholash vositalari, raqamli baholash, elektron ta’lim, shakllantiruvchi baholash, yakuniy baholash, ta’lim texnologiyalari, avtomatik baholash, talabalar faolligi, fikr-mulohaza, masofaviy ta’lim.

How to Cite

ONLINE ASSESSMENT TOOLS. (2026). "XXI ASRDA INNOVATSION TEXNOLOGIYALAR, FAN VA TAʼLIM TARAQQIYOTIDAGI DOLZARB MUAMMOLAR" Nomli Respublika Ilmiy-Amaliy Konferensiyasi, 4(5), 504-516. https://www.universalpublishings.com/index.php/itfttdm/article/view/18744

Abstract

Ushbu maqola zamonaviy ta’lim tizimida onlayn baholash vositalarining mohiyati va qo‘llanilishini o‘rganadi. Unda raqamli baholash tizimlarining asosiy xususiyatlari, afzalliklari va ta’lim jarayonidagi muammolari yoritilgan. Tadqiqot onlayn platformalar talabalarning faolligini oshirishi, tezkor fikr-mulohaza berishi va samarali baholashni ta’minlashini ko‘rsatadi. Shuningdek, akademik halollik, raqamli tengsizlik va o‘qituvchilarning texnologik savodxonligi kabi muammolar tahlil qilingan. Maqola onlayn baholash vositalari ta’lim sifatini oshirishda muhim rol o‘ynaydi, degan xulosaga keladi.

PDF
DOI

References

1.Abduraxmanova, Z., & Mamurova, M. (2021). THEORETICAL APPROACH TO SPEECH DISFLUENCIES IN SIMULTANEOUS INTERPRETATION. In МОЛОДОЙ ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬ: ВЫЗОВЫ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ (pp. 43-45).

2.Абдурахманова, З. (2022). Analysis of pauses and interuptions as elements of linguistic production in simultaneous interpretation. Современные инновационные исследования актуальные проблемы и развитие тенденции: решения и перспективы, 1(1), 533-535.

3.Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.

4.Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. Routledge.

5.Brown, H. D. (2018). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Education.

6.Chapelle, C. A., & Voss, E. (2017). Technology and assessment in language learning. Cambridge University Press.

7.Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory Into Practice, 55(2), 153–159.

8.Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351.

9.Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 53–64.

10.Jordan, S. (2013). E-assessment: Past, present and future. New Review of Information Networking, 18(1), 1–13.

11.Nicol, D. (2007). Principles of good assessment and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 199–218.

12.Redecker, C., & Johannessen, Ø. (2013). Changing assessment—towards a new assessment paradigm using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 79–96.

13.Zilola, A., Bahodir, N., & Munisa, Y. (2023). Approaches and activities that help develop intercultural competence. Journal of Academic Research and Trends in Educational Sciences, 2(2), 204–208.

14.Zilola, A., Sohibxon, S., & Afruza, A. (2023). The cultural legacy: Advertising, broadcasting, and cinema. Journal of Academic Research and Trends in Educational Sciences, 2(2), 220–224.

Indexed In · Partners

Trusted by Global Scientific Indexing Services

JUSR is indexed and recognized by leading international databases and research integrity organizations.