Open Access · Peer Reviewed
PDF
DOI

Keywords

tuproq organik moddasi, gumus, organik uglerod, matematik modellashtirish, RothC modeli, CENTURY modeli, uglerod aylanishi, raqamli tuproq xaritalash, agroekologik monitoring

How to Cite

TUPROQ ORGANIK MODDA TO‘PLANISHINI KUZATISH VA BAHOLASHDA MODELLARDAN FOYDALANISH. (2026). "XXI ASRDA INNOVATSION TEXNOLOGIYALAR, FAN VA TAʼLIM TARAQQIYOTIDAGI DOLZARB MUAMMOLAR" Nomli Respublika Ilmiy-Amaliy Konferensiyasi, 4(5), 458-470. https://www.universalpublishings.com/index.php/itfttdm/article/view/18714

Abstract

Ushbu maqolada tuproq organik moddasining to‘planishi, saqlanishi va o‘zgarishini kuzatish hamda baholashda matematik, statistik, geoinformatsion va jarayonli modellardan foydalanish masalalari yoritilgan. Tuproq organik moddasi tuproq unumdorligi, strukturasi, namlikni saqlash qobiliyati, mikrobiologik faolligi, oziqa elementlari aylanishi va uglerod muvozanatining asosiy ko‘rsatkichlaridan biri hisoblanadi.

PDF
DOI

References

[1] Stevenson F.J. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions. New

York: John Wiley & Sons, 1994. [2] Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food

security // Science. 2004. Vol. 304. No. 5677. P. 1623–1627. [3] FAO. Soil Organic Carbon: The Hidden Potential. Rome: Food and

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2017. [4] Jenny H. Factors of Soil Formation: A System of Quantitative Pedology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1941. [5] Smith P., Smith J.U., Powlson D.S., McGill W.B., Arah J.R.M., Chertov

O.G., Coleman K., Franko U., Frolking S., Jenkinson D.S., Jensen L.S., Kelly R.H., Klein-Gunnewiek H., Komarov A.S., Li C., Molina J.A.E., Mueller T., Parton W.J., Thornley J.H.M., Whitmore A.P. A comparison of the performance of nine soil

organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments // Geoderma. 1997. Vol. 81. P. 153–225. [6] Webster R., Oliver M.A. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2007. [7] Goovaerts P. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. New York:

Oxford University Press, 1997. [8] McBratney A.B., Mendonça Santos M.L., Minasny B. On digital soil

mapping // Geoderma. 2003. Vol. 117. Issues 1–2. P. 3–52. [9] Hillel D. Environmental Soil Physics. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998. [10] Coleman K., Jenkinson D.S. RothC-26.3 — A model for the turnover of

carbon in soil // Evaluation of Soil Organic Matter Models. Berlin: Springer, 1996. P. 237–246.[11] Parton W.J., Schimel D.S., Cole C.V., Ojima D.S. Analysis of factors

controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands // Soil Science

Society of America Journal. 1987. Vol. 51. P. 1173–1179. [12] Li C. Modeling trace gas emissions from agricultural ecosystems //

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 2000. Vol. 58. P. 259–276. [13] IPCC. 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National

Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2019. [14] Minasny B., McBratney A.B. Digital soil mapping: A brief history and

some lessons // Geoderma. 2016. Vol. 264. P. 301–311.

Indexed In · Partners

Trusted by Global Scientific Indexing Services

JUSR is indexed and recognized by leading international databases and research integrity organizations.