Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Language varies according to context, audience, and purpose. These variations manifest through styles, registers, and genres, each playing a crucial role in communication. This article explores the distinctions and interconnections among these linguistic concepts, examining their functions, characteristics, and significance in different communicative settings. By understanding styles, registers, and genres, we can appreciate the adaptability of language and its role in shaping discourse across various domains.
References
1. Kabilova Sayyora Abdukarimovna. (2023). THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE STUDY EUPHEMISMS. Proceedings of International Conference on Modern Science and Scientific Studies, 2(6), 119–123. Retrieved from https://econferenceseries.com/index.php/icmsss/article/view/2256
2. Sayyora, Kabilova. "Metaphor in Newspapers." JournalNX, vol. 7, no. 1, 2021, pp. 210-214.
3. Aston, Guy, and Burnard, Lou. 1998. The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
4. Atifi, Hassan, and Marcoccia, Michel. 2006. Television genre as an object of negation: A semio-pragmatic analysis of French political “television forums.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 250–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Atkinson, Dwight. 1992. The evolution of medical research writing from 1735 to 1985: The case of the Edinburgh Medical Journal. Applied Linguistics 13: 337–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Atkinson, Dwight. 1996. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society 25: 333–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Atkinson, Dwight. 1999. Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
